The Effect Of Profitability And Corporate Social Responsibility On The Value Of Companies In State-Owned Banks Listed On The Idx
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on: (1) The Effect of Profitability Driven by ROE and NPM on Company Value (2) The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Company Value. The study population is 6 state-owned banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2021-2022. The sampling technique is a saturated sample. The sample of this study is 6 companies. Data analysis with multiple regression. The results of this study conclude that: (1) ROE has a significant positive effect on the value of the company with a significance level of 0.031< 0.05 and H1 is accepted. (2) NPM did not have a significant effect on the company's value with a significance level of 0.955< 0.05 and H2 was rejected. (3) CSR did not have a significant effect on the company's value with a significance level of 0.390 < 0.05 and H3 was rejected. In this study, it is recommended: (1) Researchers use a more international standard openness index measurement, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2) Expand the sample by using all companies listed on the IDX, (3) The next researcher to be able to extend the research period with a larger and more diverse sample number and use a more standardized corporate social responsibility disclosure index measurement internationallyanalyze the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) financial performance on company value. The object of the study is all state-owned banking companies totaling 6 banks from 2018 to 2019. The independent variables are company performance (return on equity, Net Profit Margin), and Corporate Cocial Responsibility, while the dependent variable is the company's value (Tobin's Q). The data analysis used was multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study show that ROE has a significant influence on company value, while NPM, and CSR do not have a significant influence on company value.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Amri, C. (2013). Analysis of The Influence Financial Performance, Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Respon-sibility of Companies. Online). Http://Library. Gunadarma. Ac. Id Accessed in September.
Anom, P. I. B., & Bambang, S. H. (2019). The role of profitability in mediating influences good Corporate Governance, business risk, Corporate Social Responsibility and firm value of banking companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 93(9), 241–251.
Ardimas, W., & Wardoyo, W. (2014). Pengaruh kinerja keuangan dan corporate social responsibility terhadap nilai perusahaan pada bank go public yang terdaftar di BEI.
Basalamah, A. S., & Jermias, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting and auditing in Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7(1), 109–127.
Ghozali. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program. Badan Penerbit.
Gras-Gil, E., Manzano, M. P., & Fernández, J. H. (2016). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 289–299.
Handoko, Y. (2010). Effect on Value of Financial Performance Company with Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and as Good Corporate Governance Moderating Variable. Journal of Economics Universitas Gunadarma.
Haruman, T. (2008). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Keputusan Keuangan Dan Nilai Perusahaan Survey pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di PT. Bursa Efek Indonesia.
Issham, I., Fazilah, A., Hwa, Y., KAMIL, A., Azli, A., & Ayub, M. (2008). Economic value added (eva) as a performance measurement for glcs vs non-glcs: evidence from bursa malaysia. Prague Economic Papers, 2.
Jackson, E. A., & Jackson, H. F. (2017). The role of corporate social responsibility in improving firms’ business in the directions of sustainable development, accountability and transparency. African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 6(2–3), 105–118.
Kusumadilaga, R. (2010). Pengaruh corporate social responsibility terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan profitabilitas sebagai variabel moderating (Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Perpustakaan FE UNDIP.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108.
Lisiantara, G. A., Jaeni, J., Nugroho, A. H. D., & Hardiningsih, P. (2023). Corporate Characteristics on Firm Values With Moderation of Good Corporate Governance. Fokus Ekonomi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 18(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.34152/fe.18.2.209-220
Mandevere, M. (2024). Corporate social responsibility in state-owned enterprises: Zimbabwe Revenue Authority. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 12(1), 9.
Marpaung, N., Yahya, I., & Sadalia, I. (2022). The Effect of Liquidity, Profitability, Capital Structure, Asset Growth, And Firm Size on the Firm Value with Dividend Policy as a Moderating Variable in Food and Beverage Sub-Sector of Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Research and Review, 9(7), 268–282.
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3.
Rachmat, R. A. H., Hardika, A. L., Gumilar, I., & Saudi, M. H. M. (2019). Capital structure, profitability, and firm value: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 6(6), 182–192.
Rostiani, R. (2015). PENGARUH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN DENGAN PRESENTASE KEPEMILIKAN MANEJERIAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL PEMODERASI (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2010-2014). Fakultas Ekonomi Unpas.
SETIAWAN, T. (n.d.). PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS DAN PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2010-2013.
Subanidja, S., Rajasa, A., Suharto, E., & Atmanto, J. D. (2016). The determinants of firm value: The role of earnings management and good corporate governance. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(4), 609–615.
Sukamulja, S. (2004). Good corporate governance di sektor keuangan: Dampak GCG terhadap kinerja perusahaan (Kasus di Bursa Efek Jakarta). Benefit: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis (Jurnal Ini Sudah Migrasi), 8(1), 1–25.
Wahyudi, U., & Pawestri, H. P. (2011). Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Dengan Keputusan Keuangan Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 1(2), 61–70.
Wardani, R. A. N. A. P. (2023). PENGARUH RETURN ON ASSET (ROA), PRICE EARNING RATIO (PER), OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN (OPM) DAN CORPORATE SOCIAL. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia STIE Widya Wiwaha, 3(4), 1256–1278.
Yaldo, I., Dong, H., Woodbine, G., & Fan, Y. (2014). An ontological model for corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting based on global reporting initiative GRI G4.
Yuniasih, N. W., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2007). Effect of Financial Performance on the Corporate Value Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance As moderating variables. Accounting Department, University of Udayana.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.